Potholer54 carbon dating australia largest dating
After 5,730 years, the amount of carbon 14 left in the body is half of the original amount.
If the amount of carbon 14 is halved every 5,730 years, it will not take very long to reach an amount that is too small to analyze.
And so without further ado I will begin my critique and I encourage everyone to watch and read along, pausing when necessary. Try reading the picture; it was clearly mocking Creationism in favor of evolution.
Next time you have to go to the bathroom but opt for holding it, thank that bone. Hence the title "100 Reasons Why Evolution is stupid is stupid" I left out the SO so that the title would fit (please don't be confused by the two so's right next to each other in this sentence). I'm also aware that I have the "is stupid" twice, that's because I am calling Hovind's original video, entitled "100 Reasons Evolution is So Stupid" stupid. Actually its a huge pain for historians to deal with it because although theres no "proof" of it, you have to admit that from the Sumerians to north america, going to through germany and india, people, both in different times and at the same time in different places, with no connection to each other, all of them have a "great flood" on their "tales".
You are mocking creationism and that video proves why you shouldn't. Yes, we need our Coccyx and it wasn't an evolve "tail".
Kent Hovind is a creationist and explains why the whale needs that (for reproduction).
This half life is a relatively small number, which means that carbon 14 dating is not particularly helpful for very recent deaths and deaths more than 50,000 years ago.
Carbon is naturally in all living organisms and is replenished in the tissues by eating other organisms or by breathing air that contains carbon.